Re: [ssn] equivalence axioms to relate the old ssn to the new ssn.

Hi Kerry,
Nice work! Those mappings are really necessary for end users.
However, I don't understand why we need a new namespace/ontology for this
type of mappings.
Wouldn't be better to have those mappings in the same ontology file, in the
new ssn namespace?
Btw, I was looking at http://www.w3.org/ns/ssn/ and there are still missing
those nice metadata that you have in the equivalences file. ( + dct:issued
property as well)

Best,
Ghislain

Le mar. 6 déc. 2016 à 14:52, Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au> a
écrit :

> SSN-ers,
>
> I have built a small ontology to relate the classes and properties of ssn
> in its new namespace  (http://www.w3.org/ns/ssn/) to the classes and
> properties of the old  (SSN-XG) ssn in its old namespace .  The intention
> of this is that it becomes a part of the normative ssn but is served in a
> different ontology file so that it does not need to be loaded up in order
> to use the new ssn. However, it (hopefully) will enable us to use
> implementations of the old ssn as proof of implementations of the new ssn
> (where concepts by all of intension ,  rdfs: comment description,  and the
> suffix part of their names have not changed).
>
>
>
> Please see it here
> https://github.com/w3c/sdw/blob/gh-pages/ssn/ssn_separated/ssn_equivalences.owl
>  I would like to include this in the FPWD so that our plan for
> implementation evidence can be tested before it is too late. I will also
> get it into the rec document, I hope.
>
>
>
> Any comments gratefully received.
>
> -Kerry
>
>
>
-- 
--------------------------------------------
Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D
R&D Engineer
@ Mondeca, Paris, France
Labs: http://labs.mondeca.com
Tel: +33 (0)1 4111 3034
Web: www.mondeca.com
Twitter: @gatemezing
About Me: http://atemezing.org