- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 10:20:58 +0000
- To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Dear all, With next week's F2F imminent, I wanted to try and give the WG some pointers to what needs to be done between now and June, W3C process-wise. Scott/others may have more to add to complete the OGC side of things. Horizontal Review ================= As everyone is, I think, well aware, the target for next week's meeting is that all documents will be published/updated immediately after the Christmas and New Year break. Existing WDs updated, the Coverages documents published as FPWDs. We should use those publications as the basis for seeking horizontal reviews from the Internationalisation, Accessibility, Security and Privacy groups (this can take up to 3 months so every week counts). This means we send e-mails to those groups inviting review, highlighting areas where we think they'll have particular interest, or, to say we don't see any specific areas of interest to them but would welcome their confirmation of that. Implementation Reports for SSN and OWL Time =========================================== If SSN and OWL Time are to become Recs/standards we must gather evidence of implementation. Although not formally required for the other documents, it adds weight to them if we can do it. I know the SSN group has this front and centre of their minds, I'm more concerned about OWL Time. If we don't have the capacity to identify and document uses of the vocab, it will have to be a Note. Even then, we need to close off the currently open issues. To reach Rec by the end of June, we need to have gather that implementation evidence by mid-May the very latest (Proposed Rec) which means we need to be into Candidate Rec immediately after the March F2F in Delft, i.e. *all* issues closed, document stable and complete, ready for implementation. No normative changes can be made after this (or you have to re-run the CR phase). I don't mean to sound like an ogre/whip cracker, I'm just trying to give info about the scale of the task ahead of us. Unlike OGC, W3C WGs *do* have a fixed term. Our original charter expires at the end of this month. I don't expect an extension to be possible after 30 June 2017, nor do I think it desirable so the clock is ticking. Phil. -- Phil Archer Data Strategist, W3C http://www.w3.org/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2016 10:21:06 UTC