Friday, 30 December 2016
Thursday, 29 December 2016
Wednesday, 28 December 2016
- Re: OWL-Time - ISSUE-65: General purpose temporal predicates
- RE: OWL-Time - ISSUE-65: General purpose temporal predicates
- Re: OWL-Time - ISSUE-65: General purpose temporal predicates
- Re: OWL-Time - ISSUE-65: General purpose temporal predicates
- RE: ISSUE-124 - deprecate January and Year
- OWL-Time - ISSUE-65: General purpose temporal predicates
Tuesday, 27 December 2016
Thursday, 22 December 2016
- Re: ISSUE-124 - deprecate January and Year
- RE: ISSUE-124 - deprecate January and Year
- RE: OWL-Time ISSUE-127 TimeZone model
- RE: OWL-Time ISSUE-127 TimeZone model
- RE: Cleaning up OWL-Time document
- Re: ISSUE-124 - deprecate January and Year
- Re: issue-117: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- Re: Please review OWL-Time document
- RE: Please review OWL-Time document
- Re: ISSUE-124 - deprecate January and Year
- Please review OWL-Time document
- RE: OWL-Time ISSUE-127 TimeZone model
- RE: SSN - Notes dropped from O&M alignment chapter?
- RE: ISSUE-124 - deprecate January and Year
- RE: ISSUE-124 - deprecate January and Year
- FW: "Year", "January" - RE: Time Ontology outstanding Issue 11
- RE: SSN - Notes dropped from O&M alignment chapter?
- RE: "Year", "January" - RE: Time Ontology outstanding Issue 11
- RE: issue-117: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- RE: issue-117: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
Wednesday, 21 December 2016
- Cleaning up OWL-Time document
- RE: OWL-Time ISSUE-127 TimeZone model
- RE: "Year", "January" - RE: Time Ontology outstanding Issue 11
- Re: Good educational resource for the CRS section
- Changelog for SSN document
- Re: ISSUE-124 - deprecate January and Year
- ISSUE-124 - deprecate January and Year
- coverage: eo-qb is ready
- RE: SSN - Notes dropped from O&M alignment chapter?
- OWL-Time ISSUE-127 TimeZone model
- Re: SSN - Notes dropped from O&M alignment chapter?
- RE: SSN - Notes dropped from O&M alignment chapter?
- Re: SSN - Notes dropped from O&M alignment chapter?
- RE: Time Ontology outstanding Issue 6
- SSN - Notes dropped from O&M alignment chapter?
Tuesday, 20 December 2016
- Re: [Minutes SSN] 2016-12-20
- [Minutes SSN] 2016-12-20
- RE: TimeZone class - RE: Time Ontology outstanding Issue 10
- RE: Time Ontology outstanding Issue 6
- RE: ISSUE-26 RE: Time Ontology outstanding Issue 3
- Re: issue-117: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- Re: new issues raised for ssn
- Re: SDW BP sub-group: no call this week (it's nearly Christmas!)
- Re: SDW BP sub-group: no call this week (it's nearly Christmas!)
- issue-117: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- Re: SDW BP sub-group: no call this week (it's nearly Christmas!)
- RE: SDW BP sub-group: no call this week (it's nearly Christmas!)
- SDW BP sub-group: no call this week (it's nearly Christmas!)
- OWL-Time - response to Chris Little issues
- "Year", "January" - RE: Time Ontology outstanding Issue 11
- TimeZone class - RE: Time Ontology outstanding Issue 10
- RE: [sdw] ssn meeting this week + process of changes to WD until then
Monday, 19 December 2016
- Re: [sdw] ssn meeting this week + process of changes to WD until then
- RE: [w3c/sdw] SSN - move description of SOSA before SSN ontology (#465)
- Dial in details (was Re: [sdw] ssn meeting this week + process of changes to WD until then)
- Re: [sdw] ssn meeting this week + process of changes to WD until then
- Re: Good educational resource for the CRS section
- [sdw] ssn meeting this week + process of changes to WD until then
Sunday, 18 December 2016
- remaining problems with ssn
- RE: Time Ontology outstanding Issue 6
- RE: [w3c/sdw] SSN - move description of SOSA before SSN ontology (#465)
- SSN - Does new SSN <import> SOSA?
- reordering SOSA and SSN in the ssn deliverable
- Re: [w3c/sdw] SSN - move description of SOSA before SSN ontology (#465)
- RE: [w3c/sdw] SSN - move description of SOSA before SSN ontology (#465)
- RE: [w3c/sdw] SSN - move description of SOSA before SSN ontology (#465)
- ISSUE-66 RE: Time Ontology outstanding Issue 9
- RE: Time Ontology outstanding Issue 10
- RE: Time Ontology outstanding Issue 11
- ISSUE-26 RE: Time Ontology outstanding Issue 3
- ISSUE-64 ISSUE-65 RE: Time Ontology outstanding Issue 1 [and 2]
- ISSUE-15 RE: Time Ontology outstanding Issue 4
- RE: Time Ontology outstanding Issue 1 [and 2]
Saturday, 17 December 2016
- RE: SSN - should we swap ssn and sosa section order?
- Re: SSN - should we swap ssn and sosa section order?
Friday, 16 December 2016
- SSN - should we swap ssn and sosa section order?
- RE: isObservedBy - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- Re: isObservedBy - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- Time Ontology outstanding Issue 11
- Time Ontology outstanding Issue 8
- Time Ontology outstanding Issue 7
- Time Ontology outstanding Issue 2
- Time Ontology outstanding Issue 12
- Time Ontology outstanding Issue 10
- Time Ontology outstanding Issue 9
- Time Ontology outstanding Issue 6
- Time Ontology outstanding Issue 5
- Time Ontology outstanding Issue 4
- Time Ontology outstanding Issue 3
- London F2F Photo
- Re: BP editors draft ready for review
- Re: BP editors draft ready for review
- Re: BP editors draft ready for review
- Re: Time Ontology outstanding Issue 1 [and 2]
- RE: Time Ontology outstanding Issue 1 [and 2]
- Good educational resource for the CRS section
- RE: Time Ontology outstanding Issue 1
- Time Ontology outstanding Issue 1
- RE: BP editors draft ready for review
- Connection details for remote attendance please?
- Re: Changes to SSN document as discussed in London F2F on 15th of December
- Re: BP editors draft ready for review
- Re: BP editors draft ready for review
- RE: Changes to SSN document as discussed in London F2F on 15th of December
- RE: BP editors draft ready for review
- RE: BP editors draft ready for review
Thursday, 15 December 2016
- RE: units of measure - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- RE: proposed new text for SSN ISSUE-110
- RE: units of measure - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- RE: proposed new text for SSN ISSUE-110
- Changes to SSN document as discussed in London F2F on 15th of December
- clarifying ssn issue raised in f2f
- Re: BP editors draft ready for review
- proposed new text for SSN issue "999"
- Re: units of measure - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- Re: BP editors draft ready for review
- RE: Time Ontology outstanding issues: Notes to be removed or incorporated
- Re: SOSA time properties - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- Re: isObservedBy - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- Re: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- Re: SOSA time properties - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- Re: isObservedBy - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- Re: sosa:Sample - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- Re: units of measure - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- RE: ssn ready for review
- Re: SOSA time properties - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- SOSA time properties - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- isObservedBy - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- units of measure - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- Re: sosa:Sample - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- sosa:Sample - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- RE: Time Ontology outstanding issues: Notes to be removed or incorporated
Wednesday, 14 December 2016
- Re: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations
- RE: Time Ontology outstanding issues: Notes to be removed or incorporated
- Re: BP editors draft ready for review
- Time Ontology outstanding issues
- RE: ssn ready for review
- Re: ssn ready for review
- Re: ssn ready for review
- Re: ssn ready for review
- Re: ssn ready for review
Tuesday, 13 December 2016
- RE: ssn ready for review
- Re: ssn ready for review
- Re: ssn ready for review
- RE: ssn ready for review
- BP editors draft ready for review
- Re: ssn ready for review
- Pull-request - some comments on SSN RE: ssn ready for review
- RE: ssn ready for review
- RE: ssn ready for review
- RE: ssn ready for review
Monday, 12 December 2016
- Re: ssn ready for review
- Re: ssn ready for review
- ssn ready for review
- Candidate FPWD of CoverageJSON document for discussion in London
Friday, 9 December 2016
- Re: [ssn] equivalence axioms to relate the old ssn to the new ssn.
- Re: [ssn] equivalence axioms to relate the old ssn to the new ssn.
Thursday, 8 December 2016
- RE: [ssn] equivalence axioms to relate the old ssn to the new ssn.
- RE: Usage of the SSN ontology
- Re: BP examples in the wild
- BP examples in the wild
Wednesday, 7 December 2016
- FW: Spatial Data on the Web Working Group Charter Extended
- PR for EO-QB comment
- RE: Final 6 months
- Re: Usage of the SSN ontology
- Re: [ssn] equivalence axioms to relate the old ssn to the new ssn.
- Re: WG homepage tidy up
- London F2F dial in info
- Final 6 months
- WG homepage tidy up
- Re: Usage of the SSN ontology
- Re: Usage of the SSN ontology
Tuesday, 6 December 2016
- BP sub-group meeting cancelled (again)
- Re: Coverage subgroup call, 07 Dec, 2000 UTC
- RE: Coverage subgroup call, 07 Dec, 2000 UTC
- [ssn] equivalence axioms to relate the old ssn to the new ssn.
- Coverage subgroup call, 07 Dec, 2000 UTC
Monday, 5 December 2016
- Usage of the SSN ontology
- [sdw] ssn meeting this week
- Re: ISSUE-87: why is sosa-core:observable property renamed
- Re: ISSUE-94: Why do we need the sosa-core Feature of interest class at all?
Sunday, 4 December 2016
- ISSUE-86: Annotation for a feature of interest (etc)
- ISSUE-94: Why do we need the sosa-core Feature of interest class at all?
- ISSUE-87: why is sosa-core:observable property renamed