- From: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 11:21:00 +0000
- To: Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, "Tandy, Jeremy" <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>, Payam Barnaghi <payam.barnaghi@gmail.com>
- Cc: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, "sdwwg@lists.opengeospatial.org" <SDWWG@lists.opengeospatial.org>
- Message-ID: <CADtUq_0SU3JiL7Yn27uWk_r0Cj3sKkCwZtjRLN5scGoW=Ksa_g@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Bart. I remember the demo well (or at least I think I do!) ... In essence, you were using a WFS to expose a "trivial" Feature that contained geometry, type and a link to an RDF resource with all the "semantic" information? I think that we could incorporate in a best practice itself _and_ as a worked example in the "Nieuwhaven flooding" scenario. We need to determine which best practices are relevant here; what is the essence of your solution? (e.g. Is it the splitting of geo and semantic information and/or other things) ... Do you have any suggestions? Jeremy On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 at 11:48, Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl> wrote: > Hi Linda, Jeremy and Payam, > > On July 20th [1] I gave a demo about an extra attribute in WFS services to > expose linkage to a linked data representation of the object which is > represented by the feature on the map. > Based on the feedback during that meeting we tweaked the details and we > are now actively using that for our projects at the Dutch emergency > services. > > I'd like to move this to a Best Practice or relate it to a existing one > how can I make that happen ? > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2016/07/20-sdw-minutes.html > > Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards > Bart van Leeuwen > > ############################################################## > # twitter: @semanticfire > # netage.nl > # http://netage.nl > # Esdoornstraat 3 > # 3461ER Linschoten > # tel. +31(0)6-53182997 > ############################################################## > Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards > Bart van Leeuwen > > ############################################################## > # twitter: @semanticfire > # netage.nl > # http://netage.nl > # Esdoornstraat 3 > # 3461ER Linschoten > # tel. +31(0)6-53182997 > ############################################################## > > > > From: Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com> > To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, " > sdwwg@lists.opengeospatial.org" <SDWWG@lists.opengeospatial.org> > Date: 20-07-2016 18:38 > Subject: Minutes Plenary Call > ------------------------------ > > > > Hello everyone, > > Here is the irc-log of today's call, thanks once again to Linda for > scribing. > > *https://www.w3.org/2016/07/20-sdw-minutes.html* > <https://www.w3.org/2016/07/20-sdw-minutes.html> > > As I mentioned at the end of the call we are approaching the Northern > Hemisphere summer and Holiday period, over the next few weeks there may be > fewer people available to take part on the calls. > > I'd be interested in your views.. do we cancel meetings for a couple of > weeks or just allow calls to be organised within the groups on an ad-hoc > basis, I know the SSN work will not be affected as much... > > Ed > > > -- > > *Ed Parsons *FRGS > Geospatial Technologist, Google > > Google Voice *+44 (0)20 7881 4501* <%2B44%20%280%2920%207881%204501> > *www.edparsons.com* <http://www.edparsons.com/> @edparsons > >
Received on Wednesday, 31 August 2016 11:21:41 UTC