- From: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:50:38 +0000
- To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADtUq_2nRj7CMzSNs6hc9JG7=O8x-KLuSiLYBdGLFtCcaG+TSg@mail.gmail.com>
All- BP5 [1] addresses the situation where the properties of a spatial thing are updated due to some new measurement or assertion. For example, the boundary geometry of flooded area will change as the flood levels rise and fall, or the details of a land parcel may be updated due to a new survey. In this case, the resource is a spatial thing whose properties are captured as a series of discrete snapshots through time. Those snapshots may be created on a fixed schedule (e.g. as a result of an annual survey) or ad-hoc (e.g. some one notices that things have changed). There is a second case where properties change over time: when the property is a time dependent variable that is being measured or estimated according to some sampling regime. In this case, the resource seems to be a "time-series" of property values. For example, the water level of a canal, the wind speed measured at routine intervals by an anemometer, or the GPS position of a fishing vessel. (time-series are one-dimensional coverages) So in the example case of the canal and its water-level, the canal (a spatial object) has a property "water-level" that refers to a water-level time-series coverage. As coverages are themselves features (so says OGC et al) then we can also say that our water-level time-series coverage is also a spatial thing (albeit a conceptual spatial thing that you can't trip over in the real world). Is this second case a valid "possible approach to implementation" that should be added to BP 5? If so, please can someone in the working group suggest some criteria as when to use the "property snapshot" pattern (case 1) or the "time-series coverage" pattern (case 2). (for me it's subjective, but seems to be related to the intent to establish a coherent sampling regime for a property value as opposed to an ad-hoc update) Jeremy BTW, I've deliberately skipped over the "value assignment" concern (e.g. how values are assigned to properties) as described in ISO 19109 ยง7.4.10 ValueAssignment - for example, how OM_Observation can be used to relate the "observed value" to a "feature of interest" with all the metadata about the observation or measurement process. I don't think this is relevant for this BP. [1]: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#desc-changing-properties
Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2016 14:51:19 UTC