Re: Are we covering linear referencing?

I think it falls under re-use of vocabularies again - i.e. for linear
referencing one should ideally look to an OGC standard, and we should look
to the basic spatial ontology proposal to make sure that positioning is
general enough to be a linear reference.

Rob

On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 at 19:11 Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com> wrote:

> I would suggest its rather an edge case, most common in the Architecture,
> Engineering and Construction (AEC) part of the  industry... I think we have
> bigger fish to fry...
>
> Ed
>
>
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 at 09:38 Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I just wondered if the practice of linear referencing
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_referencing> (a.k.a. dymanic
>> segmentation) is also covered by our work. I guess this type of data falls
>> in the coverage category. Will there be examples of linear referencing in
>> the coverage deliverables or perhaps in the BP deliverable?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Frans
>>
>> --
>
> *Ed Parsons *FRGS
> Geospatial Technologist, Google
>
> Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501
> www.edparsons.com @edparsons
>