Re: QB4ST - Spatio-temporal extension to RDF-QB

I've also created this page to get some ideas together for the note on RDF
datacube for coverages:
https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Beginnings_of_a_W3C_note

Regards,
Dmitry Brizhinev

On 17 August 2016 at 22:20, Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com> wrote:

> Thanks Dmitry.  Agree that we should aim for consensus and an integrated
> single outcome on use of data cube for coverage data.
>
>
>
> On 17 August 2016 at 13:04, Dmitry Brizhinev <dmitry.brizhinev@anu.edu.au>
> wrote:
>
>> The ANU team thinks it would be good to look at Rob's work and ours
>> side-by-side and synthesise the important bits into a final product.
>> We submit for your consideration the ontology we've been using:
>>
>> https://github.com/ANU-Linked-Earth-Data/ontology/blob/master/ANU-LED.owl
>>
>> And a minimal example of how it can be used:
>>
>> https://github.com/ANU-Linked-Earth-Data/ontology/blob/maste
>> r/ANU-LED-example.owl
>>
>>
>> It would be really instructive if Rob could construct such an example for
>> QB4ST. I (for one) find it much easier to understand ontologies that way :)
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dmitry Brizhinev
>>
>>
>>
>> On 16 August 2016 at 17:46, Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Rob - will read and comment
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Bill
>>>
>>> On 15 August 2016 at 08:51, Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have created an initial set of specialisations of RDF-QB elements to
>>>> support an interoperable means of describing spatio-temporal
>>>> characteristics of dimensions and measures in metadata about data sets.
>>>>
>>>> There is a wiki page with some introduction to RDF-QB here:
>>>> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/RDF_Datacube_for_Coverages
>>>>
>>>> and the ttl is here:
>>>> https://github.com/rob-metalinkage/sdw/blob/gh-pages/coverag
>>>> es/qb4st/qb4st.ttl
>>>>
>>>> (and i generated a pull request).
>>>>
>>>> Requesting a sanity check ASAP - and feel free to educate me on how
>>>> such things _ought_ to be defined - first step is to outline what is
>>>> required and what it needs to do - then we can refine the logic and
>>>> language.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Rob Atkinson
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>