W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > August 2016

Re: QB4ST - Spatio-temporal extension to RDF-QB

From: Dmitry Brizhinev <dmitry.brizhinev@anu.edu.au>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 22:04:06 +1000
Message-ID: <CAGA4AMKb153+8ZfvPKvQ40bH6vrr1b5NADSWxbVsEqqEjAMkfg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com>
Cc: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
The ANU team thinks it would be good to look at Rob's work and ours
side-by-side and synthesise the important bits into a final product.
We submit for your consideration the ontology we've been using:


And a minimal example of how it can be used:


It would be really instructive if Rob could construct such an example for
QB4ST. I (for one) find it much easier to understand ontologies that way :)

Dmitry Brizhinev

On 16 August 2016 at 17:46, Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com> wrote:

> Thanks Rob - will read and comment
> Cheers
> Bill
> On 15 August 2016 at 08:51, Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au> wrote:
>> I have created an initial set of specialisations of RDF-QB elements to
>> support an interoperable means of describing spatio-temporal
>> characteristics of dimensions and measures in metadata about data sets.
>> There is a wiki page with some introduction to RDF-QB here:
>> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/RDF_Datacube_for_Coverages
>> and the ttl is here:
>> https://github.com/rob-metalinkage/sdw/blob/gh-pages/coverag
>> es/qb4st/qb4st.ttl
>> (and i generated a pull request).
>> Requesting a sanity check ASAP - and feel free to educate me on how such
>> things _ought_ to be defined - first step is to outline what is required
>> and what it needs to do - then we can refine the logic and language.
>> Cheers
>> Rob Atkinson
Received on Wednesday, 17 August 2016 12:15:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:25 UTC