Wednesday, 31 August 2016
- RE: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions"
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions"
- Re: Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- Re: Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- Re: UCR ISSUE-70: add a requirement for avoiding coordinate transformations?
- Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions"
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- minutes of joint WoT and oneM2M meeting just now for SSN interest
- Re: Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision
- Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions"
- Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions"
- Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions"
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions"
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- [Minutes] 2016-08-31
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- Re: Decision required: BP 17 "How to work with crowd sourced observations"
- Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions"
- Decision required: BP 17 "How to work with crowd sourced observations"
- Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions"
- Re: SDW Plenary next meeting
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- Re: SDW Plenary next meeting
- Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions"
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- Re: Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- Re: Minutes Plenary Call
- RE: Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision
- Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions"
- RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions"
- Re: SDW Plenary next meeting
- Re: Minutes Plenary Call
- RE: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions"
- Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions"
- Re: Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions"
- Request for help: BP 9 "How to describe relative positions"
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
Tuesday, 30 August 2016
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- Clarification required: BP 16 "Provide a minimum set of information for your intended application"
- SDW Plenary next meeting
- Fwd: RfC: Wide review of Generic Sensor and Ambient Light Sensor API
- Re: Review UCR w.r.t. SSN
- Call for Exclusions (Update): Semantic Sensor Network Ontology
- Re: Coverage tasks for TPAC
- Re: item for SDW plenary call, 31-Aug
- item for SDW plenary call, 31-Aug
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
Monday, 29 August 2016
Sunday, 28 August 2016
Friday, 26 August 2016
- Coverage tasks for TPAC
- RE: Make your data indexable by search engines
- RE: Clarification required: BP5 "describing properties that change over time" [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- RE: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- Re: Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision
- RE: Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision
Thursday, 25 August 2016
- Re: Review UCR w.r.t. SSN
- Re: Review UCR w.r.t. SSN
- RE: Should Best Practices in the BP document be viewed as requirements for SSN and Coverages (and Time)?
- RE: Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision
- Re: Some more stuff about coordinate reference systems
- Should Best Practices in the BP document be viewed as requirements for SSN and Coverages (and Time)?
- Requirements for units of measure, accuracy and precision
- RE: Review UCR w.r.t. SSN
- [Minutes-BP] 2016-08-24
- RE: Namespace persistence etc
- coverages discussion at Lisbon F2F
- Re: Namespace persistence etc
Wednesday, 24 August 2016
- TPAC / F2F4 planning for Best Practice sub-group
- [Minutes-COV] 2016-08-24
- Re: SSN/SOSA/O&M: is an observation an event, activity, or information object?
- Review UCR w.r.t. SSN
- Re: Make your data indexable by search engines
- Re: Make your data indexable by search engines
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- Re: Namespace persistence etc
- RE: Coverage subgroup call, Wednesday 24 August, 1300 UTC
- Re: Namespace persistence etc
- Re: Make your data indexable by search engines
- Re: Make your data indexable by search engines
- Re: Clarification required: BP5 "describing properties that change over time" [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- RE: SSN/SOSA/O&M: is an observation an event, activity, or information object?
- Re: Clarification required: BP5 "describing properties that change over time" [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- RE: Make your data indexable by search engines
- Re: Namespace persistence etc
- Re: Clarification required: BP5 "describing properties that change over time" [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- coverage discussions at TPAC
- Re: Make your data indexable by search engines
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- Re: Clarification required: BP5 "describing properties that change over time" [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- RE: Make your data indexable by search engines
- RE: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- Re: Some more stuff about coordinate reference systems
- Re: Clarification required: BP5 "describing properties that change over time" [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Tuesday, 23 August 2016
- RE: Make your data indexable by search engines
- SSN/SOSA/O&M: is an observation an event, activity, or information object?
- [Minutes-SSN] 2016-08-23
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- Re: Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- RE: UCR ISSUE-31: is the validation requirement in scope?
- Clarification required: BP6 "use HTTP URIs for spatial things"
- Clarification required: BP5 "describing properties that change over time"
- Re: UCR ACTION-111: new SSN requirements?
- Coverage subgroup call, Wednesday 24 August, 1300 UTC
- Re: Make your data indexable by search engines
- RE: Make your data indexable by search engines
- Make your data indexable by search engines
Monday, 22 August 2016
- Re: Best Practice sub-group call
- Re: Best Practice sub-group call
- Re: Best Practice sub-group call
- Re: Best Practice sub-group call
- Best Practice sub-group call
- Re: sdw: ssn meeting this week
- Re: Are we covering linear referencing?
- sdw: ssn meeting this week
- Re: Are we covering linear referencing?
- Re: Are we covering linear referencing?
- Re: Are we covering linear referencing?
- Are we covering linear referencing?
- Re: ACTION-85 Use Case
- RE: Question about identifiers
- Re: Question about identifiers
- RE: Question about identifiers
Sunday, 21 August 2016
Saturday, 20 August 2016
Friday, 19 August 2016
- Re: Question about identifiers
- Re: Question about identifiers
- Re: Question about identifiers
- Re: Question about identifiers
- RE: Question about identifiers
- Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement
- Re: Question about identifiers
- Re: Question about identifiers
- Re: Question about identifiers
- Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement
- RE: Question about identifiers
- Re: Question about identifiers
- Re: Question about identifiers
- Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement
- RE: UCR issue 30: missing requirement
- Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement
- Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement
Thursday, 18 August 2016
- RE: Question about identifiers
- Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement
- Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement
- Question about identifiers
Wednesday, 17 August 2016
- Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement
- UCR ISSUE-31: is the validation requirment in scope?
- [Minutes] 2016-08-17
- Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement
- Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement
- Re: QB4ST - Spatio-temporal extension to RDF-QB
- Re: QB4ST - Spatio-temporal extension to RDF-QB
- Re: QB4ST - Spatio-temporal extension to RDF-QB
- Re: QB4ST - Spatio-temporal extension to RDF-QB
- UCR ACTION-111: new SSN requirements?
- Re: ACTION-85 Use Case
- Re: ACTION-85 Use Case
- RE: BP restructuring: Spatial Data Identifiers section
Tuesday, 16 August 2016
- Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements
- Re: UCR ISSUE-29: add a requirement for linking CRS to geometry?
- Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements
- Re: ACTION-85 Use Case
- Re: QB4ST - Spatio-temporal extension to RDF-QB
- sdw: agenda for meeting this week
Monday, 15 August 2016
- Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements
- Re: ACTION-85 Use Case
- BP restructuring: Spatial Data Identifiers section
- Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements
- sdw; Fwd: RE: About joint web-conf with oneM2M (Wed, 31 Aug. 8am EDT)
- QB4ST - Spatio-temporal extension to RDF-QB
Thursday, 11 August 2016
Wednesday, 10 August 2016
- coverage subgroup call, 1300UTC, Wednesday 10 August
- issue-72: language for ssn core module, focused on inverseOf in particular
- Re: No BP telecon this week(?)
Tuesday, 9 August 2016
- RE: Action-191
- Re: sdw: ssn task for next ssn meeting
- Re: [SSN] FW: INSPIRE O&M & SWE requirements best practice document
- Action-191
- RE: BP restructuring: Metadata section
- No BP telecon this week(?)
Monday, 8 August 2016
- [SSN] FW: INSPIRE O&M & SWE requirements best practice document
- RE: Some more stuff about coordinate reference systems [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- sdw: ssn meeting this week
Sunday, 7 August 2016
Friday, 5 August 2016
- "Exploiting Open Data" event, Brussels 11-13 October
- Re: SDW WG WS @ INSPIRE 2016
- RE: QB Data Cube Dicing. Was: Coverage subgroup update
- Some more stuff about coordinate reference systems
- Re: QB Data Cube Dicing. Was: Coverage subgroup update
Thursday, 4 August 2016
- Re: Australia plans new co-ordinates to fix sat-nav gap [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- Re: QB Data Cube Dicing. Was: Coverage subgroup update
- RE: QB Data Cube Dicing. Was: Coverage subgroup update
Wednesday, 3 August 2016
- RE: CRS "Gotchas"
- Re: CRS "Gotchas"
- Re: CRS "Gotchas"
- CRS "Gotchas"
- Re: agenda for SDW plenary meeting this week
- Re: sdw: ssn task for next ssn meeting
- RE: agenda for SDW plenary meeting this week
- RE: sdw: ssn task for next ssn meeting
- Re: Fw: Australia plans new co-ordinates to fix sat-nav gap [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- Re: agenda for SDW plenary meeting this week
- RE: agenda for SDW plenary meeting this week
- Fw: Australia plans new co-ordinates to fix sat-nav gap [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- RE: [w3c/sdw] SSN / SOSA / Activity Hierarchy (#309)
- RE: [w3c/sdw] SSN/SOSA-Core/ Host vs Platform vs Device vs Observer (#336)
Tuesday, 2 August 2016
- RE: agenda for SDW plenary meeting this week
- RE: Australia plans new co-ordinates to fix sat-nav gap
- Re: ISO 19115 - DCAT - Schema.org mapping (working draft)
- Re: ISO 19115 - DCAT - Schema.org mapping (working draft)
- Re: ISO 19115 - DCAT - Schema.org mapping (working draft)
- Re: ISO 19115 - DCAT - Schema.org mapping (working draft)
- RE: BP restructuring: Data Quality and Versioning sections
- Re: BP restructuring: Data Quality and Versioning sections
- Re: ISO 19115 - DCAT - Schema.org mapping (working draft)
- ISO 19115 - DCAT - Schema.org mapping (working draft)
Monday, 1 August 2016
- RE: Request for input to the BP doc: an introduction to CRSs and related concepts
- RE: agenda for SDW plenary meeting this week
- Re: BP restructuring: Data Quality and Versioning sections
- RE: agenda for SDW plenary meeting this week
- Re: agenda for SDW plenary meeting this week
- Re: Request for input to the BP doc: an introduction to CRSs and related concepts
- Re: agenda for SDW plenary meeting this week
- Re: Request for input to the BP doc: an introduction to CRSs and related concepts
- Re: agenda for SDW plenary meeting this week
- RE: agenda for SDW plenary meeting this week
- Re: agenda for SDW plenary meeting this week
- Re: agenda for SDW plenary meeting this week
- agenda for SDW plenary meeting this week
- BP restructuring: Data Quality and Versioning sections
- RE: Best Practices narrative update
- Re: Request for input to the BP doc: an introduction to CRSs and related concepts
- Re: Request for input to the BP doc: an introduction to CRSs and related concepts
- Re: BP restructuring: Metadata section
- Re: Request for input to the BP doc: an introduction to CRSs and related concepts
- RE: BP restructuring: Metadata section
- RE: BP restructuring: Metadata section
- Re: BP restructuring: Metadata section
- RE: Request for input to the BP doc: an introduction to CRSs and related concepts