RE: [ssn] alignments

Yes I am aware too.  But I got rather disheartened  by the missing attribution in the earlier version http://www.slideshare.net/drshorthair/om-alignment-with-ssn-prov-oboe-bfo

Kerry



From: Simon.Cox@csiro.au [mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au]
Sent: Thursday, 14 April 2016 2:44 PM
To: Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>; Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>; jano@geog.ucsb.edu; danh.lephuoc@deri.org
Cc: public-sdw-wg@w3.org
Subject: [ssn] alignments

FWIW here is the presentation I gave at AGU in December:

http://www.slideshare.net/drshorthair/pitfalls-in-alignment-of-observation-models-resolved-using-prov-as-an-upper-ontology
http://abstractsearch.agu.org/meetings/2015/FM/IN33F-07

This picks up various threads, including the paper by Mick, David Corsar and Kerry relating SSN to PROV, as well as related work proceeding in the Bio community where there is effort to link OBOE to the ontology suite based on BFO. I know Jano is already across this, but not sure if the rest of you had seen it.

Simon

From: Kerry Taylor [mailto:kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au]
Sent: Thursday, 7 April 2016 12:19 AM
To: Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au<mailto:armin.haller@anu.edu.au>>; jano@geog.ucsb.edu<mailto:jano@geog.ucsb.edu>; Le Phuoc, Danh <danh.lephuoc@deri.org<mailto:danh.lephuoc@deri.org>>
Cc: public-sdw-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Subject: [ssn] editor's draft

I did a lot of writing on the editor's draft today - it still looks like notes but is getting close to covering all the issues in the "work plan" section. http://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/ So I am hoping little more is needed in that section, subject to  feedback.

I also wrote a lot about modularity there  -- things to be done rather than what has been done already - but feel free to appropriate  any of that into the modularity section as you see appropriate.

On the other hand, the Modularity section, I think,  needs to make very clear (write it as if it is final) description of how SSN is broken up now and how it interacts with dul and how the namespace/redirect is (intended to be) managed.

Does that sound ok?
Kerry