W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > April 2016

Re: CRS84 broken URI resolve

From: Maik Riechert <m.riechert@reading.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 22:21:54 +0100
To: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5706CF72.3000607@reading.ac.uk>
Well, it's not the one defined in the OGC document that invented the 
first URI. Why have two by the same organisation for the exact same 
thing? It just makes clients harder to write if people actually would 
start using both variants.

Maik

Am 07.04.2016 um 22:18 schrieb Raphaël Troncy:
>> Why does http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/1.3/CRS84 not resolve to
>> anything?
>> Why does http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/ogc/1.3/crs84 resolve?
>> Please fix that, the second URI is not the correct one!
>
> Why is the second URI not a "correct" one? What "correct" means in 
> this context? A URI is just an identifier ... it could well be an 
> opaque URI and still be very correct.
>
>   Raphaël
>
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2016 21:22:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:20 UTC