Re: OGC testbed 11 results

Hello Peter,

Wow, 15-065r1 seems to be highly relevant for many SDDWG deliverables, it
has coverage. sensors and time. And it is not even part of
the Cross-Community Interoperability thread, but of the Urban-Climate
Resilience thread. I think this confirms that the testbed 11 reports are
worth looking in to.

It seems the reports are available only to OGC members at this time. I
wonder if the applicable reports can become available to all SDDWG
members...

Regards,
Frans





2015-09-08 15:03 GMT+02:00 Peter Baumann <p.baumann@jacobs-university.de>:

> Hi Frans,
>
> indeed, a large amount of valuable work has been accomplished in Testbed
> 11.
>
> Let me point to the particularly relevant OGC 15-065r1
>     Testbed11 Referenceable Grid Harmonization Engineering Report
>
> It has led to the next-generation coverage model, OGC Coverage
> Implementation Schema (CIS) 1.1. This is a compatible continuation of OGC's
> current coverage model, adds in sensor models as per SensorML 2.0 and
> encompasses isolated further concepts, such as timeslice-interleaved
> representation, GML 3.3 non-regular grids. Also, it clarifies interpolation.
>
> As CIS 1.1 is organized in "compartments" (requirements classes) it is
> possible for an implementation (or referencing standard) to select a
> suitable subset and leave out features not relevant.
>
> After next week's OGC TC meeting I will be able to post the document for
> discussion.
>
> best,
> Peter
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2015-09-08 14:39, Frans Knibbe wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> An OGC interoperability testbed
> <http://www.opengeospatial.org/projects/initiatives/testbed11>, the
> eleventh of the series, has finished this summer. One of the four
> technology threads
> <http://www.opengeospatial.org/projects/initiatives/testbed11/#mozTocId547125>
> is closely related to our work: Cross-Community Interoperability (CCI). The
> CCI effort, like the other threads, results in a number of engineering
> reports. Those reports are listed here
> <http://www.opengeospatial.org/projects/initiatives/testbed11/#mozTocId447063>.
> Some of the reports have already been published (see this table
> <http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/per>), I assume the rest will
> follow soon.
>
> Should we make a concerted effort to go through the CCI reports and
> cross-reference them with our use cases, requirements and nascent best
> practices?
>
> Regards,
>
> Frans
>
> --
> Frans Knibbe
> Geodan
> President Kennedylaan 1
> 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)
>
> T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
> E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
> www.geodan.nl
> disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Peter Baumann
>  - Professor of Computer Science, Jacobs University Bremen
>    www.faculty.jacobs-university.de/pbaumann
>    mail: p.baumann@jacobs-university.de
>    tel: +49-421-200-3178, fax: +49-421-200-493178
>  - Executive Director, rasdaman GmbH Bremen (HRB 26793)
>    www.rasdaman.com, mail: baumann@rasdaman.com
>    tel: 0800-rasdaman, fax: 0800-rasdafax, mobile: +49-173-5837882
> "Si forte in alienas manus oberraverit hec peregrina epistola incertis ventis dimissa, sed Deo commendata, precamur ut ei reddatur cui soli destinata, nec preripiat quisquam non sibi parata." (mail disclaimer, AD 1083)
>
>
>
>


-- 
Frans Knibbe
Geodan
President Kennedylaan 1
1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)

T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
www.geodan.nl
disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>