- From: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 14:36:48 +0200
- To: Alejandro Llaves <allaves@fi.upm.es>
- Cc: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 29 May 2015 12:37:17 UTC
Hello Alejandro, I am looking at the Multiple types of coverage <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#MultipleTypesOfCoverage> requirement now: "It should be possible to represent many different types of coverage." Does this mean some kind of standard classification of coverage types is required, so the coverage type can be indicated in the metadata for example? Or does this mean that there should be standard encodings for different coverage types? Greetings, Frans -- Frans Knibbe Geodan President Kennedylaan 1 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL) T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347 E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl www.geodan.nl disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
Received on Friday, 29 May 2015 12:37:17 UTC