The Multiple types of coverage requirement

Hello Alejandro,

I am looking at the Multiple types of coverage
requirement now: "It should be possible to represent many different types
of coverage."

Does this mean some kind of standard classification of coverage types is
required, so the coverage type can be indicated in the metadata for example?

Or does this mean that there should be standard encodings for different
coverage types?


Frans Knibbe
President Kennedylaan 1
1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)

T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
disclaimer <>

Received on Friday, 29 May 2015 12:37:17 UTC