W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > May 2015

Re: any chance of that?

From: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 09:32:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFVDz40RM+84WK+7mDU1_+wFcHjgEp5jA_fR=8CEbmH+TYJQng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Payam Barnaghi <payam.barnaghi@gmail.com>
Cc: Kerry Taylor <Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au>, Alejandro Llaves <allaves@fi.upm.es>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Hello Payam, Alejandro,

Thank you Payam, the top 3 scenarios are much easier to digest than 101 use
cases. Now we need to see how this use case relates to deliverables and
requirements.

It seems to me the smart city use cases are mainly about best practices and
sensors.

An important requirement seems to be linkability
<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#Linkability>.
The first scenario even requires real time linkability. For (near) real
time sensor data there is the dynamic sensor data
<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#DynamicSensorData>
requirement.

Could there be requirements in this use case that we have not discovered
yet?

@Alejandro: the dynamic sensor data
<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#DynamicSensorData>
requirement
seems to have two components: (near) real time data and streamable data.
The streamable part is covered by the streamable data
<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#Streamable>
requirement. Shall we change the label to something like '(near) real time
data'? Of course, as ever we also need to ask ourselves if the requirements
are in scope. The streamable data requirement could be considered in scope
because spatial objects can have a high volume. But is there something
spatial about real time data access? If there is. I think we should make it
clear in the description of the requirement.

Regards,
Frans

2015-05-27 1:06 GMT+02:00 Payam Barnaghi <payam.barnaghi@gmail.com>:

> Hi Kerry, Alejandro and Frans,
>
> I updated the 101 use-cases and added narratives from the top 3 ranked
> scenarios. I can edit and add a few more narratives if you think this needs
> to be extended further.
>
> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Working_Use_Cases#.22101.22_Smart_City_Use-cases
>
> Please let me know if you want me add any further information to this
> section.
>
> Thanks,
> Payam
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:48 PM, <Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au> wrote:
>
>>  Summary of 101 use cases before the Wednesday meeting? Otherwise it
>> will miss out on the “first public working draft” of the ucr document. If
>> you could put it on the wiki, and tell me and use case editors (cc’d) then
>>  I think we can use it.
>>
>> I am keen because I want to make sure that we have a clear IoT  target.
>>
>>
>>
>> Kerry
>>
>>
>>
>> *Dr Kerry Taylor*
>>
>> *Principal  Research Scientist*
>>
>> Digital Productivity, CSIRO
>>
>> Adjunct Professor, ANU; Principal Fellow, University of  Melbourne;
>> Visiting Reader, University of Surrey, UK
>>
>>  E: Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au or  Kerry.Taylor@acm.org  T: +61 2 6216 7038
>> S: kerryleataylor
>>
>> Post: CSIRO Digital Productivity Flagship, GPO Box 664, Canberra ACT
>> 2601, Australia
>>
>> Street:  Computer Science & Information Technology (Building 108),
>> Australian National University, North Road, Acton ACT, Australia
>>
>> www.csiro.au
>>
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
Frans Knibbe
Geodan
President Kennedylaan 1
1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)

T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
www.geodan.nl
disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2015 07:32:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:16 UTC