Re: Next f2f meeting

Hi All,

The intention is to have a two day F2F at TPAC. My preference as this is a
W3C activity is to have the F2F at a W3C event, but I appreciate the
logistical challenges.

Ed


On 26 March 2015 at 08:34, Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'd rather have it at TPAC since there is another WG meeting there as well.
> I have no business at ISWC this year and leveraging the benefits of being
> at that conference means paying the full conference fee as well.
>
> Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards
> Bart van Leeuwen
>
> ##############################################################
> # twitter: @semanticfire
> # netage.nl
> # http://netage.nl
> # M.A. Reinaldaweg 79
> # 3461AJ Linschoten
> # tel. +31(0)6-53182997
> ##############################################################
>
>
>
> From:        <Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au>
> To:        <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
> Date:        26-03-2015 02:57
> Subject:        Next f2f meeting
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Telemeeting (a) this morning discussed the proposed location of next f2f
> in japan for the last week in october, with the w3c TPAC meeting. There
> were several people suggested holding it collocated with the iswc in the
> us, october 11-15 in pennsylvania, USA instead
> *http://iswc2015.semanticweb.org* <http://iswc2015.semanticweb.org/>.
> Several people suggested they could make it there at iswc, but not to a
> sapporo event.
>
> I am not yet sure what happened in the parallel meeting on this question,
> but there is clearly a demand for iswc collocation.
> comments? Perhaps a doodle poll is  called for?
>
> Kerry
>



-- 


Ed Parsons <http:////plus.google.com/110553637244873297610?prsrc=3>
Geospatial Technologist, Google

Mobile: +44 (0)7
​825 382263

Personal blog www.edparsons.com/blog/


"It's better to be a pirate than to join the Navy."