- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:37:51 +0000
- To: Scott Serich <sserich@opengeospatial.org>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Indeed, thanks Scott. On 12/03/2015 10:07, Scott Serich wrote: > Typo: ORG link should (I think) be http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/. > > ===== > Scott Serich, Ph.D., JD > Director, Interoperability Programs, Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) > +1 (703) 283-3432 > sserich@opengeospatial.org > Skype: scott.serich.ogc > The OGC: Making Location Count. > www.opengeospatial.org > ===== > > From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> > Date: Thursday, March 12, 2015 at 5:48 AM > To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org> > Subject: What is an implementation of an ontology? > Resent-From: <public-sdw-wg@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:48:09 +0000 > > Simon asked me what the WG has to do to get an ontology through the W3C > process, specifically, what counts as an implementation. > > Essentially the Candidate Recommendation stage is there to provide > evidence that what has been specified actually works, as proved by (at > least two) two independent implementations (I heard here in Barcelona > that the equivalent rule at OGC is three implementations?) > > There are three recent vocabularies that provide examples of the kind of > thing we're looking for. Like all Recs, these three vocabs all link to > their implementation reports: > > DCAT http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat > ORG http://www.w3.org/vocab-org > Data Cube http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube > > http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/DCAT_Implementations > http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ORG_Implementations > http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Data_Cube_Implementations > > For ORG and Data Cube, Dave Reynolds created a validator tool, see > http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Validator, which was used in the > implementation reports. > > The reports gather evidence that the vocabularies are being used, > ideally in real world scenarios, which elements are being used in each > case etc so that you can check that each of the terms has been used at > least twice. > > It's a high bar, but that's what we're aiming for wrt OWL Time, SSN and > Coverage in LD. > > HTH > > Phil. > > -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 12 March 2015 11:37:47 UTC