Tuesday, 30 June 2015
- Re: Dynamic CRS Datums. Was: UCR issue: phrasing of CRS requirement(s)
- Dynamic CRS Datums. Was: UCR issue: phrasing of CRS requirement(s)
- SDWWG Next Meeting
- Re: the Best Practices skeleton
- Re: the Best Practices skeleton
- Re: the Best Practices skeleton
- RE: Minor additions to GH Repo, over to OGC
Monday, 29 June 2015
- Re: Minor additions to GH Repo, over to OGC
- Re: Minor additions to GH Repo, over to OGC
- Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today
- Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today
- Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today
- Re: Minor additions to GH Repo, over to OGC
- RE: the Best Practices skeleton
- Re: the Best Practices skeleton
- Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today
- Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today
- Re: the Best Practices skeleton
Sunday, 28 June 2015
Saturday, 27 June 2015
Friday, 26 June 2015
- RE: Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document.
- Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today
- Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today
- Re: Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document.
- RE: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today
Thursday, 25 June 2015
- Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today
- Re: Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document.
- Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today
- Re: Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document.
- Re: Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document.
- RE: Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document.
- RE: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today
- Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today
- the Best Practices skeleton
- RE: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today
- Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today
- Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today
- Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today
- Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today
- RE: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today
- RE: Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document.
Wednesday, 24 June 2015
- Re: Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document.
- RE: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today
- Re: Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document.
- Re: Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document.
- Re: Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document.
- Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today
- Re: Resolving UCR issues
- Re: Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document.
- Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document.
- Re: Resolving UCR issues
- Re: Resolving UCR issues
- RE: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- Regrets for today
- Re: [SDWWG] Next meeting Wed 24 June
- Meeting 150624 regrets
- Re: [SDWWG] Next meeting Wed 24 June
- Re: [SDWWG] Next meeting Wed 24 June
Tuesday, 23 June 2015
- Re: [SDWWG] Next meeting Wed 24 June
- Re: [SDWWG] Next meeting Wed 24 June
- Re: [SDWWG] Next meeting Wed 24 June
- [SDWWG] Next meeting Wed 24 June
- will put this ISSUE-10 re CRS on the agenda for tomorrow.
- Re: Resolving UCR issues
- Re: Resolving UCR issues
- Re: Resolving UCR issues
Monday, 22 June 2015
- Re: Resolving UCR issues
- Re: Resolving UCR issues
- Resolving UCR issues
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- RE: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
Friday, 19 June 2015
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- RE: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
Thursday, 18 June 2015
- Re: Comments on Data on the Web Best Practices: BP-1 & BP-2
- Re: Kicking off Editorial DRAFT of BP Document
- 2nd CFP: ISWC 2015 Workshop on Semantic Sensor Networks and Terra Cognita
- Re: Kicking off Editorial DRAFT of BP Document
- Re: Kicking off Editorial DRAFT of BP Document
- Kicking off Editorial DRAFT of BP Document
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- RE: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
Wednesday, 17 June 2015
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- Re: [Minutes] 2015-06-17
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- [Minutes] 2015-06-17
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- Regret for today
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- RE: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
- Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
Tuesday, 16 June 2015
- Re: Review of UC4.43
- Re: Review of UC4.43
- Re: Review of UC4.42
- Re: Review of UC4.42
- RE: BP Principles- more added [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- SDWWG Next Meeting
- Re: Regrets for this weeks call
- Re: Regrets for this weeks call
- Regrets for this weeks call
- Re: Minor additions to GH Repo, over to OGC
- RE: Minor additions to GH Repo, over to OGC
Monday, 15 June 2015
- Re: Frozen copy?
- Minor additions to GH Repo, over to OGC
- Re: BP Principles- more added [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- Misuse of spatial data [was: Re: BP Principles- more added] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Saturday, 13 June 2015
Friday, 12 June 2015
- Re: Frozen copy?
- Re: [sdw] created FPWD for use case doc and fixed validation errors (#7)
- Re: BP Principles- more added [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- Re: Use of "note" CSS class in UCR doc
- Re: Frozen copy?
- Re: BP Principles- more added [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Thursday, 11 June 2015
- Re: BP Principles- more added [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- Re: BP Principles- more added [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- BP Principles- more added
- Re: Making a public snapshot from the GitHub repo
- [Minutes] 2015-06-10
Wednesday, 10 June 2015
- Re: Frozen copy?
- Re: Frozen copy?
- Re: Making a public snapshot from the GitHub repo
- Re: Linking to candidate requirements from the UCR document
- Re: Frozen copy?
- Making a public snapshot from the GitHub repo
- RE: Frozen copy?
- Re: proposed change to UC & Req doc to use issue numbers from tracker
- Re: proposed change to UC & Req doc to use issue numbers from tracker
- proposed change to UC & Req doc to use issue numbers from tracker
- Re: compound use cases
- RE: Frozen copy?
- Frozen copy?
- RE: [SDWWG] agenda for meeting this week
- Re: The 'valid time' requirement
- Re: The 'valid time' requirement
- Re: More UCR comments
- Re: Landing page for SDW documents on w3c.github.io
- Re: More UCR comments
- Landing page for SDW documents on w3c.github.io
- Re: The 'valid time' requirement
Tuesday, 9 June 2015
- RE: The 'valid time' requirement
- Re: The 'valid time' requirement
- Re: More UCR comments
- Re: Geospatial-semantic Exploration on the Move [via Geospatial Semantic Web Community Group]
- Re: FW: Geospatial-semantic Exploration on the Move [via Geospatial Semantic Web Community Group]
- Re: The making of Leaflet: lessons learnt
- Re: More UCR comments
- RE: Temporal reference system
- Geofencing API
Monday, 8 June 2015
Sunday, 7 June 2015
- Re: The model reuse requirement
- Re: The model reuse requirement
- Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement
- Re: The model reuse requirement
- Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement
- Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement
- Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement
Friday, 5 June 2015
- Re: The SSN requirement 'Reference external vocabularies'
- Re: Quick review of the UCR doc
- RE: The Multiple types of coverage requirement
- The SSN requirement 'Reference external vocabularies'
- RE: The model reuse requirement
- Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement
- RE: Temporal reference system
- Re: The making of Leaflet: lessons learnt
- Re: Temporal reference system
- Re: The model reuse requirement
- RE: The 'valid time' requirement
- Linking to candidate requirements from the UCR document
- Re: The 'valid time' requirement
- Re: The 'valid time' requirement
- Re: The 'valid time' requirement
- Re: The model reuse requirement
Thursday, 4 June 2015
- RE: The model reuse requirement
- RE: Temporal reference system
- The making of Leaflet: lessons learnt
- RE: The Multiple types of coverage requirement
- RE: The 'valid time' requirement
- UCR snapshot uploaded to OGC portal
- FW: Geospatial-semantic Exploration on the Move [via Geospatial Semantic Web Community Group]
- RE: Quick review of the UCR doc
- Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement
Wednesday, 3 June 2015
- Re: simplicity or web developer friendliness as requirements?
- RE: Quick review of the UCR doc
- RE: The 'valid time' requirement
- RE: simplicity or web developer friendliness as requirements?
- RE: Quick review of the UCR doc
- [Minutes] 2015-06-03
- Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement
- RE: The Multiple types of coverage requirement
- Re: comments on UCR
- Use of "note" CSS class in UCR doc
- Re: [SDWWG] SDWWG Next Meeting
- Re: Quick review of the UCR doc
- Re: Editorial amendments to UCR
- Re: simplicity or web developer friendliness as requirements?
- Likely regrets (was: Re: SDWWG Next Meeting)
- Regrets for the next call
Tuesday, 2 June 2015
- More UCR comments
- Re: any chance of that?
- RE: Temporal reference system
- Re: any chance of that?
- Re: any chance of that?
- Re: comments on UCR
- comments on UCR
- Re: The 'valid time' requirement
- Re: Temporal reference system
- Re: Editorial amendments to UCR
- Re: Editorial amendments to UCR
- How to refer to issues on the tracker from the Use Case doc
- Re: Editorial amendments to UCR
- Re: The model reuse requirement
- Regrets for the next call
- Quick review of the UCR doc
- RE: simplicity or web developer friendliness as requirements?
- RE: The 'valid time' requirement
Monday, 1 June 2015
- Re: The "Resolution global grid" requirement [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- Re: Temporal reference system
- Editorial amendments to UCR
- SDWWG Next Meeting
- Re: UCR issue: phrasing of CRS requirement(s) [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- Re: simplicity or web developer friendliness as requirements?
- Re: simplicity or web developer friendliness as requirements?
- Re: The positioning system requirement
- simplicity or web developer friendliness as requirements?
- Re: Georeferenced sensor and coverage data
- Re: Georeferenced sensor and coverage data
- Re: Georeferenced sensor and coverage data
- Re: Nominal temporal references
- Re: Georeferenced sensor and coverage data
- Re: Georeferenced sensor and coverage data
- Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement
- Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement
- Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement
- Re: UCR issue: phrasing of CRS requirement(s) [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- The 'valid time' requirement
- Re: The "Resolution global grid" requirement
- Re: Spatial vagueness
- Re: any chance of that?
- [Minutes] 2015-05-27
- Re: The "Resolution global grid" requirement
- Re: The positioning system requirement
- Re: About the Spatial Meronymy and Spatial Operators requirements (help needed!)