- From: Frans Knibbe | Geodan <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
- Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 13:34:08 +0100
- To: public-sdw-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <54D4B4C0.50701@geodan.nl>
Hello all, It is great to see so many and diverse use cases being contributed. I do have some questions about how the use cases will be used... 1) The approach of gathering use cases, deriving requirements from that and then making something based on those requirements looks like the traditional waterfall method of system development. That method has some known problems. Most importantly, it makes it hard to deal with developments that somehow change the requirements. Will we rigidly hold on to the requirements once they have been defined? Or do we allow requirements to change even after the phase of collecting use cases? 2) At the moment, use cases come from WG members only. We are a diverse group, but I don't know if we are a good cross section of the people that will have to work with what we come up with. It would be a pity for real and important requirements to go unnoticed because of that. Would it be a good idea to ask for comments on the use cases from other, related communities, at some point before the requirements are defined? We could ask people to send comments to the public comment mailing list (public-sdw-comments@w3.org) for instance. 3) It is my experience that in purely use case driven system design important requirements can be left out. That especially goes for requirements that do not directly come from user stories, but from common sense design principles. Principles like modularity, keeping things as simple as possible, separation of concerns. In my mind those things are very important. In case this kind of requirement does not follow from the use cases, do we still have room to add them or to keep them otherwise in mind? Regards, Frans ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Frans Knibbe Geodan President Kennedylaan 1 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL) T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347 E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl www.geodan.nl <http://www.geodan.nl> | disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 6 February 2015 12:34:42 UTC