Re: UCR ED Draft - back to you Frans and Alejandro

Hello Phil,

I am currently working on a summary of main changes between the first and
second working drafts. I thought calling it "Appendix A: History of
changes" and putting it at the bottom of the document would be a good idea,
with an added link to this new section in the document header (below the
links *This version:* and *Latest published version:*).

I guess the appropriate place to add the new section now is in
SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html
<https://github.com/w3c/sdw/blob/gh-pages/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html>,
not in index.html of the snapshot. Am I right?

And shall I save the HTMLDiff document to GitHub and add a reference to
that too (like the CSV on the Web people have done)? If we do, the new
history appendix should be in the derived index file before HTMLDiff is
executed.

Regards,
Frans





2015-12-10 11:46 GMT+01:00 Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>:

> Frans, Alejandro,
>
> Following last night's telco I have made some tweaks to the ED draft of
> the UCR doc.
>
> 1. I've added in links to the GH repo and a link to a (so far
> non-existent) diff document. I'll generate the latter when you're done.
> This is my Action-123.
>
> 2. As you know, I also made some changes when generating the snapshot,
> mostly removing or updating broken links and changing the scripting a
> little so that all text is shown by default (it's hidden if scripting is
> active). So I've put those changes back into the Ed draft so they're closer
> to being back in sync.
>
> What's left for you to do is to add a bit of editorial text highlighting
> the main changes since the last version. See
> http://www.w3.org/TR/tabular-data-model/#changes for an example of the
> kind of thing Lord Tandy was pointing us to last night.
>
> As soon as that's done I can add it to the snapshot, after which Josh and
> Scott can judge whether:
>
> - adding hyperlinks to the diff anad the GH repo;
> - adding some text that points people to the main changes since the
> previous version;
> - *no* changes to the actual content of the document;
>
> means a new R number for OGC (let's hope not but it might). At this stage,
> the snapshot from which I generated the PDF that is in the OGC Pending
> system is unchanged.
>
> Cheers
>
> Phil.
>
>
> --
>
>
> Phil Archer
> W3C Data Activity Lead
> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>
> http://philarcher.org
> +44 (0)7887 767755
> @philarcher1
>