Re: ACTION-94 a few thoughts

Thanks Jon - I mentioned Turtle just as an example of a non-HTML machine
readable format.  JSON-LD would be just as good if that is indeed indexed
by the major search engines.  HTML with embedded RDFa is possible of
course, but verbose and optimised for human-readable pages, so not the best
format for machine readable data (IMO).

On 9 December 2015 at 15:27, Jon Blower <j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk> wrote:

> Google indexes JSON-LD (using schema.org) I think? Perhaps with certain
> rules/caveats. Probably no need for Turtle per se?
>
> (Not sure if the JSON-LD has to be embedded in the header or whether it
> can be linked and found by conneg etc.)
>
> Cheers,
> Jon
>
>
>
> On 9 Dec 2015, at 15:20, Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> wrote:
>
> Could it be a problem that Google does not crawl/index Turtle? Are there
> cases conceivable where content negation with HTML as one of the supported
> formats is hard to achieve?
>
> I assume that somewhere in the Best Practices it will say: make your data
> available in several formats, at least JSON (because that is what web
> applications like) and HTML (because that is what humans and search engines
> like).
>
> Regards,
> Frans
>
>
>