- From: Joshua Lieberman <jlieberman@tumblingwalls.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 08:54:09 -0500
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Cc: Frans Knibbe | Geodan <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>, Kerry Taylor <Kerry.Taylor@acm.org>, Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>, Scott Simmons <ssimmons@opengeospatial.org>, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, Simon Cox <simon.cox@csiro.au>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Phil, The first version doesn’t have a revision number, so this version (2nd editor’s draft) should be 15-074r1. I can update the posted pdf document whenever you get a chance to correct this. Josh > On Dec 9, 2015, at 6:57 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > > Dear all, > > This evening's (tomorrow morning's) agenda includes a proposal to publish the next iteration of the UCR doc. To facilitate this I have created a frozen snapshot at [1]. I need to put it through our PubRules and other administrative stuff (like spell checking etc.) but basically it's there, valid, and without any broken links. > > @OGC Geosemantics DWG > > - W3C's last publishing date before Christmas is next Thursday, 17 Dec. > - Scott tells us that the minimum period needed for the OGC review is 8 days. > > So the clock is ticking and we don't really have time to wait until this evening's call to start the OGC process. Therefore can I suggest that: > > 1. Linda, Simon, Josh - please follow OGC process for seeking the green light to publish the doc in OGC space next Thursday. > > 2. Kerry/Ed - We should make it explicit that publication of the UCR is, of course, conditional on OGC's green light as well as the WG's. > > @Scott - did I get the OGC document number right (i.e. adding 'R2')? > > Thanks > > Phil. > > > [1] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/publishing-snapshots/2015-12-17-UseCases/ > > -- > > > Phil Archer > W3C Data Activity Lead > http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ > > http://philarcher.org > +44 (0)7887 767755 > @philarcher1 > >
Received on Wednesday, 9 December 2015 13:55:35 UTC