- From: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 16:09:45 +0200
- To: Alejandro Llaves <allaves@fi.upm.es>
- Cc: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2015 14:10:13 UTC
Hello Alejandro, About requirements 5.3 <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#GeoreferencedSensorData>, 5.5 <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#MobileSensors>, 5.7 <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#MovingFeatures> and 5.8 <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#ObservationAggregations> : Is it correct to assume that the current SSN vocabulary does not meet these requirements? Would it make sense to be explicit about that? Greetings, Frans -- Frans Knibbe Geodan President Kennedylaan 1 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL) T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347 E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl www.geodan.nl disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2015 14:10:13 UTC