- From: <Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au>
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:21:44 +0000
- To: <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <3CD3C8BBF0D87B4D8154C3978732049C50E79594@exmbx05-cdc.nexus.csiro.au>
Column AB for ssn on the UCR spreadsheet is labelled " Profiling, e.g. for checking compliance to standard model". While trying to clarify this it occurs to me that this wraps 2 requirements into 1, that I think should be separate (inheriting this combination from the OGC "profile" notion, I think). I would propose replacing it by both 1. Extensibility - it should be possible to extend the recommended structure to support domain-specific models; and 2. It should be possible to express and validate compliance to models Next, I would like to raise these to the level of applying (or not) to all our deliverables as they are not SSN-specific. Are these "vision"-ish enough to be thought of as "principles" in the current discussion? Or at least as over-arching non-functional requirements? Finally, I would like to propose that while (1) should be addressed by the group, (2) looks out of scope to me. Furthermore, technology for (2) such as RDF data shapes is still too immature for our purposes. What do you think? Kerry
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2015 13:22:46 UTC