- From: Alejandro Llaves <allaves@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:49:36 +0200
- To: Kerry Taylor <Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au>
- Cc: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABTzy2QnzdQE_8cAOGTsgAUJJpaWD6MGNem0gv=qjB2+tfpDtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sure, it does! I still don't quite understand the "nominal" part and would rephrase it as: "Be able to represent qualitative observations (e.g. of events or states)". Does it make sense? Best regards, Alejandro On 28 April 2015 at 09:46, <Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au> wrote: > Alejandro, > > Responding to the comment in the use case ss, ssn tab column M, For ssn > requirement: “detecting qualitative (nominal) events” > > > > Alejandro says: “Out of scope. We could consider event representation as > spatio-temporal features to allow linking observations to events, e.g. > using the stimulus property of SSN. But IMO, event detection should not be > part of the SSN ontology” > > > > This comment may derive from an (my?) inadequate description of the > intent that arose from many use cases at the Barcelona meeting. > > Perhaps it should be “Be able to represent measurements of nominal (or > qualitative) events or states (e.g on/off, open/ajar/closed, > excellent/good/ average/poor/horrendous)” > > > > Does that bring it back into scope? I think so. > > Kerry > > > > > -- Alejandro Llaves Ontology Engineering Group (OEG) Artificial Intelligence Department Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Avda. Montepríncipe s/n Boadilla del Monte, 28660 Madrid, Spain http://www.oeg-upm.net/index.php/phd/325-allaves allaves@fi.upm.es
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2015 08:50:05 UTC