W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > April 2015

Re: ssn requiremehts on ss

From: Alejandro Llaves <allaves@fi.upm.es>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:49:36 +0200
Message-ID: <CABTzy2QnzdQE_8cAOGTsgAUJJpaWD6MGNem0gv=qjB2+tfpDtQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kerry Taylor <Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au>
Cc: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Sure, it does! I still don't quite understand the "nominal" part and would
rephrase it as: "Be able to represent qualitative observations (e.g. of
events or states)". Does it make sense?

Best regards,
Alejandro

On 28 April 2015 at 09:46, <Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au> wrote:

>  Alejandro,
>
> Responding to the comment in the use case ss,  ssn tab column M,  For ssn
> requirement:  “detecting qualitative (nominal) events”
>
>
>
> Alejandro says: “Out of scope. We could consider event representation as
> spatio-temporal features to allow linking observations to events, e.g.
> using the stimulus property of SSN. But IMO, event detection should not be
> part of the SSN ontology”
>
>
>
> This comment may derive from an (my?)  inadequate description of the
> intent that arose from many  use cases at the Barcelona meeting.
>
> Perhaps it should be “Be able  to represent measurements of nominal (or
> qualitative)  events or states (e.g on/off, open/ajar/closed,
> excellent/good/ average/poor/horrendous)”
>
>
>
> Does that bring it back into scope? I think so.
>
> Kerry
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Alejandro Llaves

Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)

Artificial Intelligence Department

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Avda. Montepríncipe s/n

Boadilla del Monte, 28660 Madrid, Spain


http://www.oeg-upm.net/index.php/phd/325-allaves


allaves@fi.upm.es
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2015 08:50:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:16 UTC