W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > April 2015

Re: Princples...

From: Thiago José Tavares Ávila <thiago.avila@ic.ufal.br>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 18:29:18 -0300
Message-ID: <CA+EBLKo0taNPh6CJsJdBnbeC0SjufmesOjf3A=kzOfqey0f9fA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kerry Taylor <Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au>
Cc: "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Ok,
 I asked this question to give more clarity on your proposal.

2015-04-23 4:00 GMT-03:00 <Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au>:

>  Thiago,
>
> I  do not think we should be reiterating those practices – that is not our
> job. It would be unfortunate if we were contradictory, though.
>
>
>
> In our case, it is not obvious to what extent this group is focusing on
> linked data, or not, and I think our views in the group  may be divergent.
>
>
>
> The UCR document should be “A document setting out the range of problems
> that the working groups are trying to solve.”  So in that context  I
> thought to bring up the question ( deliberately phrased in the form that
> reflects my point of view!).
>
>
>
> Kerry
>
>
>
> *From:* Thiago José Tavares Ávila [mailto:thiago.avila@ic.ufal.br]
> *Sent:* Thursday, 23 April 2015 10:32 AM
> *To:* public-sdw-wg@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: Princples...
>
>
>
> Hello Kerry,
>
>
>
> For 5th principle, Does geospatial data must follow all practices of W3C
> Best Practices for Publishing Linked Data <http://www.w3.org/TR/ld-bp/> ?
>
>
>
> Regards. Thiago
>
>
>
> 2015-04-19 23:26 GMT-03:00 <Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au>:
>
> Here's 2 suggestions ( that may need improvement).
>
>
>
> No 5. That community good practice for 5 star linked data be followed,
> including the use of so-called cool uris and  ontology annotations (
> references need to be attached)
>
>
>
> No 6. That ontologies  conform (" are valid" ? check) to the language of
>  owl2 dl.
>
> (The latter is important for spatial and temporal reasoning.)
>
>
>
> No 7. ( perhaps number  0) That these principles are aimed specifically at
> data published in RDF but where appropriate may also apply to other spatial
> data published on the web.
>
>
> Kerry
>
>
>
> On 20 Apr 2015, at 8:17 am, "John Machin" <john.machin@abs.gov.au> wrote:
>
>  Hi Ed, Andreas,
>
> I like the proposed principles so far.
>
> Based on some of the comments in the last call, I wonder if we have to
> have a principle related to keeping the practices up to date?
>
> I realise that this might over-commitment from a WG with a specified
> lifespan but if maintaining currency is a principle then the two sponsor
> organisations may be encouraged to reconvene WGs to review and update the
> Best Practices periodically.
>
> Cheers,
>
> *-- John Machin*
>
> <graycol.gif>Andreas Harth ---18/04/2015 05:57:59 AM---Hi Ed, On
> 2015-04-16 14:10, Ed Parsons wrote:
>
> From: Andreas Harth <harth@kit.edu>
> To: <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>,
> Date: 18/04/2015 05:57 AM
> Subject: Re: Princples...
>  ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> Hi Ed,
>
> On 2015-04-16 14:10, Ed Parsons wrote:
> > So to start the ball rolling....
> >
> > Princple No.1 : The linkabilty of Geospatial Information published on
> > the web should be improved.
> >
> [...]
> >
> > Princple No.2 : We will not reinvent
> >
> [...]
> >
> > Feel free to add to these, develop more ... when we reach a level of
> > agreement I will transfer them over to the wiki
>
> How about the following?
>
> Principle No.3 : Best Practices have to be visible.
>
> We will link to at least one (or two, three?) publicly available
> example(s) of a non-toy dataset that follows the best practice.
>
> Cheers,
> Andreas.
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 23 April 2015 21:29:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:16 UTC