- From: lewis john mcgibbney <lewismc@apache.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 13:39:47 -0700
- To: public-sdw-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAGaRif3MsCDrJjb4nDcVBDTBX68xMV=dGPMEy=id53AJtST4Pg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Folks, We recently open sourced and transitioned the SWEET Ontology suite [0] from NASA JPL over to the ESIP Federation [1] and have renewed the interest in the resource from within ESIP and further afield. I'm currently spearheading an effort to bring SWEET up-to-date with a wide variety of advances in ontologies such as the excellent work undertaken by this WG on SOSA/SSN. Right now I am working on aligning SWEET with SOSA/SSN and would really appreciate input/peer review from this WG on alignment accuracy and extent. So far my work can be seen at [2]. I've been using the Alignment API software [3] developed by INRIA Rhône-Alpes, France to determine basic alignments. My choice of alignment software was determined by reviewing a larger list of ontology matching software [4] and making a judgement about software usability in order to determine instances of owl:equivalentClass. As you can see, currently the alignment only covers the Sensor Class. I am therefore looking to extend the alignment in any way, shape or form which is accurate and factually correct. If you are able to provide input on wherever else I may be missing additional alignments, please comment at [2]. Thank you kindly in advance, Lewis [0] https://github.com/ESIPFed/sweet [1] http://esipfed.org [2] https://github.com/ESIPFed/sweet/pull/38 [3] http://alignapi.gforge.inria.fr/align.html [4] http://ontologymatching.org/projects.html -- http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/ @hectorMcSpector http://www.linkedin.com/in/lmcgibbney
Received on Monday, 28 August 2017 20:40:16 UTC