- From: Christoph, Pascal <christoph@hbz-nrw.de>
- Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 12:22:37 +0200
- To: public-sdw-comments@w3.org
Received on Friday, 7 April 2017 10:23:30 UTC
Hello *, what's the smallest duration of time one can specifiy with the proposed time ontology? I wonder if it's really a full "second"? (Couldn't find anything smaller but may have missed it). Analog to spatial ontology, where you can define very (indefinitely?) small spatial dimensions, this should be also possible within the time ontology. If you would allow 'https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/#nt-seFrag' (instead of xsd:decimal) as datatype for time:second you wouldn't even need tons of new properties to be able to be arbitrarily precise. If it's too nice for one to always assume decimal numbers when hitting time:second I would propose one new time:TemporalUnit property (say: time:secondFrag) which would suffice to define every time(t), where "t < 1s". pascal
Received on Friday, 7 April 2017 10:23:30 UTC