- From: Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 23:53:10 +0000
- To: "Little, Chris" <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk>, Martin Desruisseaux <martin.desruisseaux@geomatys.com>, "public-sdw-comments@w3.org" <public-sdw-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHrFjcnCd3hSKRHGNuV8ZMkHNOyiQ4rjuTg8aYczL9mK2Tii5g@mail.gmail.com>
+1 On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, 01:31 Little, Chris, <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk> wrote: > +1 Excellent suggestions > > > > *From:* Martin Desruisseaux [mailto:martin.desruisseaux@geomatys.com] > *Sent:* Monday, November 07, 2016 3:50 PM > *To:* public-sdw-comments@w3.org > *Subject:* Minor tuning proposal on links related to CRS > > > > Hello all > > About the "Spatial Data on the Web Best Practices" draft document, I would > like to propose two minor editions on the links at the end of chapter 7 > (Coordinate Reference Systems) on > https://www.w3.org/TR/sdw-bp/#CRS-background. The document redirects the > reader to Spatial Reference (http://spatialreference.org/) and EPSG.io ( > http://epsg.io/) web sites for CRS definitions. But the definitions on > those web sites sometime differ from the OGC and EPSG definitions regarding > axis order and units of measurement. The definitions on those web sites are > rather the ones used by GDAL (the library behind MapServer, PostGIS and > QGIS among others). Maybe the use of those definitions was an intentional > choice? (e.g. it was the choice of GeoJSON before they deprecated CRS in > the IETF standard, precisely because they were not OGC/EPSG definitions). > If the document rather aims to reference OGC/EPSG definitions, then should > the document links to the authoritative source, which is > http://epsg-registry.org/ ? It does not mean to remove the other links, > but maybe a little explanatory text like below would be appropriate? > > Instead of: > > Lists of CRS are available from the Open Geospatial Consotium CRS > Register, Spatial Reference and EPSG.io (an open-source web service which > simplifies discovery of coordinate reference systems utilized worldwide). > > Maybe something like below? > > The authoritative source of CRS definitions is the EPSG registry. Those > definitions are also available from the Open Geospatial Consotium CRS > Register. Alternative source of CRS definitions are Spatial Reference and > EPSG.io (an open-source web service which simplifies discovery of > coordinate reference systems utilized worldwide). But those alternatives > sometime uses different axis order and units of measurements than the > authoritative definitions. > > About the link to the Apache SIS documentation in the last paragraph > (thanks!), would you mind changing the > http://sis.staging.apache.org/book/en/developer-guide.html URL to > http://sis.apache.org/book/en/developer-guide.html (i.e. just remove the > "staging" part in the URL)? > > Best regards, > > Martin Desruisseaux > > > -- *Ed Parsons *FRGS Geospatial Technologist, Google Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501 www.edparsons.com @edparsons
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2016 23:53:54 UTC