- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 09:46:11 +0000
- To: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: "'public-sdw-comments@w3.org'" <public-sdw-comments@w3.org>
Antoine, Riccardo, As Antoine will recall, the Spatial Data WG, here represented by Linda, has a particular interest in the DQV. An issue that comes up a lot in spatial datasets is that of precision and accuracy (the fact that Magna Carta was signed in 1215 is accurate, just not very precise, saying it was signed at 1215-06-15T00:00:00 is precise but inaccurate). It occurs in general datasets too but it's particularly acute for spatial. On last night's SDW call, I was asked to put you in touch with linda specifically to talk about this, in particular, how you might express these ideas in the DQV? Process note: I'm archiving this in the SDW's public comment list to avoid having to sign you all up to yet another mailing list. For tracker this is ACTION-149 -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2016 09:46:19 UTC