W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-comments@w3.org > March 2016

Data Quality Vocab for SDW

From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 09:46:11 +0000
To: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Cc: "'public-sdw-comments@w3.org'" <public-sdw-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <56D807E3.4060707@w3.org>
Antoine, Riccardo,

As Antoine will recall, the Spatial Data WG, here represented by Linda, 
has a particular interest in the DQV. An issue that comes up a lot in 
spatial datasets is that of precision and accuracy (the fact that Magna 
Carta was signed in 1215 is accurate, just not very precise, saying it 
was signed at 1215-06-15T00:00:00 is precise but inaccurate). It occurs 
in general datasets too but it's particularly acute for spatial.

On last night's SDW call, I was asked to put you in touch with linda 
specifically to talk about this, in particular, how you might express 
these ideas in the DQV?


Process note: I'm archiving this in the SDW's public comment list to 
avoid having to sign you all up to yet another mailing list.

For tracker this is ACTION-149

-- 


Phil Archer
W3C Data Activity Lead
http://www.w3.org/2013/data/

http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2016 09:46:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:22:22 UTC