- From: Lars Heuer <heuer@semagia.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:32:51 +0200
- To: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no>
- Cc: "public-sdshare@w3.org" <public-sdshare@w3.org>
[...] > It struck me that we *could* solve this outside the spec. One solution could be support for archived feeds [1]; they guarantee that a link to a feed stays stable. If a client could not process feed X for reason Y completely, it could safely retry to process feed X and then process feed X - 1 .. X - n. [1] <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5005#section-4> Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com/>
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2012 10:58:04 UTC