- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 16:22:39 -0500
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
On 12/1/15 3:40 PM, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > Getting around this "in prose" requires hacks. And since our > implementation uses an IDL compiler, this requires our IDL to be > different from the spec's IDL in gratuitous ways. I'm a little confused. What is (or should be) the spec's IDL here? If you're talking about just doing this in your own IDL, not in the spec, then you can clearly add something to your IDL implementation that allows the distinguishability you need here or something.... -Boris
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2015 21:23:10 UTC