[Bug 26985] Remove requirement for prose around iterable<> if object has indexed properties

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26985

--- Comment #17 from Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me> ---
I would be OK with saying that since this has indexed getters it is more
array-like than set-like, despite how it behaves under mutations. An
unfortunate accident of historical evolution.

Without the set-like properties and methods (size, add, has, delete), it does
seem strange for the iteration to behave like a set.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Monday, 19 October 2015 16:47:35 UTC