- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 15:12:09 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26985 Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |annevk@annevk.nl Flags| |needinfo?(d@domenic.me), | |needinfo?(annevk@annevk.nl) --- Comment #4 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> --- So the fact that putting a single-type iterable decl on DOMTokenList, say, means keys() will produce the same thing as values() (per planned spec changes; see <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1215925#c2>) is broken imo. I think the right thing to say is that for the case of indexed props and iterable<> the following apply: 1) Either the iterable<> declaration needs to take no type or its type must match the type of the indexed getter. 2) keys/values/entries should use CreateArrayIterator or just be set to the relevant Array.prototype functions. 3) forEach should perhaps also be Array.prototype.forEach. But really, it would be simpler to make the class [LegacyArrayClass] (which is legacy why again?), because then you get all of the above for free, plus map() and filter(). Why is this not a superior approach? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 18 October 2015 15:12:12 UTC