- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 15:12:09 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26985
Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |annevk@annevk.nl
Flags| |needinfo?(d@domenic.me),
| |needinfo?(annevk@annevk.nl)
--- Comment #4 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> ---
So the fact that putting a single-type iterable decl on DOMTokenList, say,
means keys() will produce the same thing as values() (per planned spec changes;
see <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1215925#c2>) is broken imo.
I think the right thing to say is that for the case of indexed props and
iterable<> the following apply:
1) Either the iterable<> declaration needs to take no type or its type must
match the type of the indexed getter.
2) keys/values/entries should use CreateArrayIterator or just be set to the
relevant Array.prototype functions.
3) forEach should perhaps also be Array.prototype.forEach.
But really, it would be simpler to make the class [LegacyArrayClass] (which is
legacy why again?), because then you get all of the above for free, plus map()
and filter(). Why is this not a superior approach?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 18 October 2015 15:12:12 UTC