- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:33:23 +0200
- To: Marcos Caceres <mcaceres@mozilla.com>, public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On 19/09/2015 17:55, Marcos Caceres wrote: > Hi All, tl;dr: The ReSpec team would like to start deprecating the > use of "old school WebIDL" in ReSpec in favor of "contiguous WebIDL". > We will soon begin showing a warning in ReSpec's pill-menu about > this. Although I support the overall direction of moving away from old-school to contiguous WebIDL, transitioning from one to the other is a lot of manual work, and is thus unlikely to happen in a very short amount of time (vs what was possible e.g. for the data-lt change). This means that a fair number of respec documents will be showing warnings for a fair amount of time, reducing the overall value of the warnings. More egoistically, it will also mean that I'll have to remove the detection of respec warnings in my groups Travis CI set up since they will be broken for a while (and I'll thus miss useful warnings from respec). Can I suggest that instead of showing the warning "soon", there be instead a more active campaign of outreach to respec users (e.g. via the chairs list as well?), and have the warning start appear at a fixed but much later deadline (e.g. 6 months or more)? Dom
Received on Monday, 21 September 2015 10:34:29 UTC