- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 08:51:26 +0200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:25 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > Foo.isFoo() is idiomatically used as an instance tester. That's not > quite URL.is(), but it's close enough that it might be good to use > different names. I was basing this on Object.is() and the lack of a Host object made me go for URL.hostIs() since we store other methods for hosts there too. > Why not .matches() and .hostMatches()? You're *comparing* two urls, after all. We use matches() on instances, not as statics on classes. That does not work well for hosts and I'm not sure I would want to force folks to create a URL instance in order to compare a string as URL. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2015 06:51:50 UTC