- From: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:20:00 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 17 July 2015 00:20:31 UTC
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 7/16/15 8:13 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > >> I'm just suggesting we use this exact mechanism for @@isConcatSpreadable >> > > Or just explicitly check for @@isConcatSpreadable in [[GetOwnProperty]] > there and return a value descriptor with the value undefined, really. But [[Get]] says: Invoke [[GetOwnProperty]]. If there is a getter, invoke it. Otherwise, throw. And [[Get]] is the way the spec gets ahold of @@isConcatSpreadable, not a direct [[GetOwnProperty]] call. Perhaps that part of the new spec is just in need of realignment? - Adam
Received on Friday, 17 July 2015 00:20:31 UTC