W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > October to December 2014

[Bug 27354] Internal slots

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:20:34 +0000
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-27354-3890-wPMgB3LHLj@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27354

Olli Pettay <bugs@pettay.fi> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bugs@pettay.fi

--- Comment #6 from Olli Pettay <bugs@pettay.fi> ---
I'm tiny bit worried we end up having hard to read idls, though it is 
not quite clear to me what kind of syntax would be used here.

And talking about slots in idl feels wrong. Because if it is bug 27355
which is driving this, the key thing isn't slot or not-slot, since "slot"
doesn't really hint strongly that object and its slot belong always to the 
same Realm.
Why would Document.implementation be expressed as a slot, but
Event.target wouldn't be.

If we want the idl to explain that some attribute is supposed to be in the same
Realm as its owner, shouldn't the annotation be something like
[SameRealm] or so.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2014 11:20:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:23 UTC