- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:20:34 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27354 Olli Pettay <bugs@pettay.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs@pettay.fi --- Comment #6 from Olli Pettay <bugs@pettay.fi> --- I'm tiny bit worried we end up having hard to read idls, though it is not quite clear to me what kind of syntax would be used here. And talking about slots in idl feels wrong. Because if it is bug 27355 which is driving this, the key thing isn't slot or not-slot, since "slot" doesn't really hint strongly that object and its slot belong always to the same Realm. Why would Document.implementation be expressed as a slot, but Event.target wouldn't be. If we want the idl to explain that some attribute is supposed to be in the same Realm as its owner, shouldn't the annotation be something like [SameRealm] or so. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2014 11:20:36 UTC