- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:51:18 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27008 --- Comment #6 from Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com> --- My intention was to use `any`, so as to avoid additional type-checks and coercions before invoking the "initializing objects from iterables" algorithm. You could add some new type that has the same semantics as `any`, I guess, e.g. `ProcessedInProse` or something. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 9 October 2014 15:51:19 UTC