- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 05:48:17 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23682 --- Comment #26 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> --- As for renaming "sequence" to "iterable", we could do that -- though Boris' recent changes already make the JS -> IDL conversion for sequence take any iterable -- but using iterable as a return type would be as confusing as sequence is now. If we did that, then we should have a type named Array<T> which means "reference to an Array object", use that as the return type of methods that want to return a new array, and have an easy to use "create a new Array object with these values" term that can be referenced. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 5 October 2014 05:48:21 UTC