Re: map() annotation for iterables?

On 10/4/14, 8:49 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote:
> However, recently all iterators gained a currently-empty common prototype [%IteratorPrototype%][1]. This was done so that, in the future, we could define %IteratorPrototype%.{map, filter, etc.}. I think this will be the more fruitful way forward.

OK.  So these methods will appear on iterators, but not random iterables 
like Map and Set unless those pull them in explicitly, right?

-Boris

Received on Sunday, 5 October 2014 03:33:51 UTC