W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > October to December 2014

Re: map() annotation for iterables?

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2014 23:33:21 -0400
Message-ID: <5430BC01.4070604@mit.edu>
To: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On 10/4/14, 8:49 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote:
> However, recently all iterators gained a currently-empty common prototype [%IteratorPrototype%][1]. This was done so that, in the future, we could define %IteratorPrototype%.{map, filter, etc.}. I think this will be the more fruitful way forward.

OK.  So these methods will appear on iterators, but not random iterables 
like Map and Set unless those pull them in explicitly, right?

-Boris
Received on Sunday, 5 October 2014 03:33:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:23 UTC