Re: map() annotation for iterables?

On Saturday, October 4, 2014, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:

> Per https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=229398#c10 we
> are giving up on getting [ArrayClass] on NodeList. iterable<> which
> gives us entries(), forEach(), Symbol.iterator, etc. is the new goal.
> bz had the thought that we could still put Array's map on the
> prototype. Would there be interest in that?
>
>
A proposal was made to add map and filter:
https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/13

Rick





>
> --
> https://annevankesteren.nl/
>
>