W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: Associating new objects with globals: how to best do it?

From: Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:03:55 -0800
Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Bobby Holley <bholley@mozilla.com>
Message-Id: <3463B4A9-327E-44C6-AC74-3B3F10CB080D@wirfs-brock.com>
To: "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>

On Feb 25, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Mark S. Miller wrote:

> Just noting that some of the ES7 proposals (e.g., WeakRefs) will require all objects (e.g., that can be pointed to weakly) to be associated with a Realm.

Why?  Are the proposal that currently say that? Can it be avoided?

Allen

Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2014 19:04:27 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mark S. Miller: "Re: Associating new objects with globals: how to best do it?"
Previous message: Allen Wirfs-Brock: "Re: Associating new objects with globals: how to best do it?"
In reply to: Mark S. Miller: "Re: Associating new objects with globals: how to best do it?"
Next in thread: Mark S. Miller: "Re: Associating new objects with globals: how to best do it?"
Reply: Mark S. Miller: "Re: Associating new objects with globals: how to best do it?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:19 UTC