- From: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:19:31 +0000
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com>, "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>
- CC: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
At first glance, to me, "any" would mean "anything except `undefined`" and "optional any" would mean "anything, including `undefined` to trigger defaults." I'm not sure if that's useful in practice, though. ________________________________________ From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 12:17 To: Allen Wirfs-Brock; Mark S. Miller Cc: public-script-coord@w3.org Subject: Re: Removing the concept of "optional any" On 2/19/14 12:15 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote: > if you were defining such a function in ES6, you might either write: > > function f(arg) { } //this feels like 'any arg' > //f.length is 1 > > or > > function f(arg=undefined) {} //this feels like 'optional any arg' > // f.length is 0 That's true. I suppose we could keep allowing "any" and "optional any" but have them processed exactly the same way (basically special-casing "optional" processing for "any") except for the .length behavior... That said, would we still want the argc check in that case? -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2014 17:20:04 UTC