W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2014

[Bug 22646] So if we want to say on a per-object basis whether it ought to be exposed to workers (which I think is useful) lets introduce "exposed to document environments", "exposed to worker environments", and [...]

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 21:35:46 +0000
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-22646-3890-cb5N0Mweha@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

--- Comment #22 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> ---
For arguments, I don't think there's a problem with just exposing them
everywhere. It's black-box indistinguishable from not exposing them (unless
it's a constructor that only takes unexposed types, since then it'd be
uncallable, but I'm not aware of any such cases). It's return values I'm more
worried about.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2014 21:35:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:19 UTC