[Bug 24291] Add a Promise type to WebIDL, and make it not distinguishable from anything


--- Comment #8 from Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com> ---
Tab, would you mind sharing the specific example where you think unioning is

To be clear, the plan is that an API accepting a promise will take anything you
give it and run it through `Promise.cast` before processing it. So you kind of
automatically get "unioning" of a sort: you can pass in any non-promise value,
and it becomes (via WebIDL overload resolution) a promise for that value.

Is that what you had in mind, or is it something different?

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 23 January 2014 02:34:45 UTC