- From: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 15:10:20 +0000
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- CC: public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>
From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:w3c@marcosc.com] > Ok, but this potentially breaks WebIDL… maybe kinda… I think most specs assume that WebIDL does its thing, then algorithmic prose runs. I mean, presumably WebIDL can be made to incorporate this automatically. Add a step at the end with "If return type is Promise, and an exception has been thrown, instead return a rejected promise with that exception." WebIDL is meant to serve us, not constrain us, right? ;)
Received on Friday, 28 June 2013 15:10:57 UTC