Re: undefined values in dictionaries

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:

> On 6/11/13 8:25 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
>
>> It seems that the current WebIDL behavior is the one that makes the most
>> sense.
>> Is this causing problems?
>>
>
> I ran into someone designing an API where all their dictionary members
> were marked as nullable because they wanted to allow passing explicit
> undefined for all of them.


That is a weird API. Where is it posted?
Why just not pass those arguments in so they're undefined in the
dictionary?