- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 09:56:23 +0900
- To: Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <samth@ccs.neu.edu>, "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au> wrote: > Should the spec continue to allow this behavior? > > or ... > > Should the resolve algorithm - which is currently infinite unwrap for > accepted / fulfilled futures - also be infinite unwrap for rejected futures? I'm satisfied with either behavior. It might be nice to have it mirror the then/chain behavior, where it fully-unwraps or single-unwraps as appropriate, but I'd likely be fine with both doing single-unwrapping or both doing full-unwrapping. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 6 June 2013 00:57:16 UTC