On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au> wrote: > Since the spec hasn't been updated, is there more info on how > `Future.accept()` will be fixed to support that code sample? My understanding is that the TC39-consensus is to keep the recursive unwrapping for return values of the then() callbacks. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Monday, 3 June 2013 09:30:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:13 UTC