- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 16:19:28 -0400
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
On 5/30/13 4:14 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >Would the same thing be useful for > "array-like", or does [ArrayClass] already cover that? [ArrayClass] should already cover that to the extent that the Array.prototype methods are generic and the objects marked with [ArrayClass] support the relevant operations. -Boris
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2013 20:20:01 UTC