On 5/30/13 4:14 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >Would the same thing be useful for > "array-like", or does [ArrayClass] already cover that? [ArrayClass] should already cover that to the extent that the Array.prototype methods are generic and the objects marked with [ArrayClass] support the relevant operations. -BorisReceived on Thursday, 30 May 2013 20:20:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:13 UTC